Hilary Benn savaged by Wolfowitz

Last week Hilary Benn reacted to NGO campaigners’ demands for the reform of the World Bank by threatening that the UK would withold some of its financial contributions to the Bank.  The problem is that the Bank places conditions on the loans it gives poor countries, forcing them to accept the privatisation of public services in return for the cash – this is something the UK government used to do, but it stopped after coming under pressure during the Make Poverty History campaign.

Benn’s threat came at the start of the Global Month of Action – an international campaign to put pressure on governments around the world – which automatically raised suspicions about his motivation.  If he feels so stongly, why didn’t the government make this threat before?  But what really got to some NGOs was the fact that Benn was only threatening to withhold £50million – out of a total contribution of £1.43billion.  Hardly the most frightening threat that Paul Wolfowitz – head of the World Bank and former Bush adviser – has had to deal with.

NGOs got on their high horse and expressed amazement that Benn hadn’t gone further.  But now Benn has got to take it in the other ear, after the World Bank hit back in quite extraordinary terms.  The FT quotes a senior Bank advisor:

“Benn is revealing himself to be an ambitious political climber who misled his hungry press corps by tossing them some fictional red meat. He manufactured a non-crisis to score points in the UK by pretending to stand up to the Bank.  It plays well in the party leadership race back home but has absolutely nothing to do with helping poor people who are starving or dying from preventable disease”.

A source close to Benn is quoted in the same story saying: “Conditionality has been one of his major concerns right from the beginning, and this announcement had nothing to do with whether or not he decides in the future to stand for the [Labour party] deputy leadership”. 

Being slagged off by Paul Wolfowitz is hardly going to hurt Benn’s chances and it is interesting that the DFID source specifically mentions the deputy position rather than the leadership elections more generally… 

4 Responses to Hilary Benn savaged by Wolfowitz

  1. Will Parbury says:

    The Benn Mark II has gone up in my estimation even further.

  2. Glass House says:

    I supect this isn’t to do with the leader of deputy leader elections. He’s fallen off the radar of late and wouldn’t win either position.

  3. Nick says:

    I actually reckon that Benn could seriously challenge Brown in the main game – he’s popular amongst members and could pick up support from a number of quarters in the PLP. But v much doubt he’d go for it.

    The field is crowded in the deputy race and it might be hard for him to even get the nominations. Peter Hain has been chasing the soft left for a while, Alan Johnson is trying to corner the “nice bloke” market, and Jon Cruddas would be soft left AND a nice bloke.

    I did see the Indy trail him as a “unity” candidate but that just reminds me how far “unity” candidates usually get. Remember Michael Ancram…

  4. Benjamin says:

    More on forced privatisation and the human consequences here:

    http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=984

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: