8 days to win the election

One of the most eye catching election promises in 2005 was Labour’s promise to give people extra days off on holiday.  According to the Labour Party document on the Warwick Agreement, the deal was that “Bank holidays cannot be counted in four weeks statutory holiday”.  This would mean that those workers whose bosses count bank holidays towards the four weeks would automatically get an extra eight days holiday per year.   The promise formed a central part of the unions’ election campaigning in 2005, with all the main Labour affiliated unions mentioning it prominently in materials sent to members before the election.   

However, this is a policy that still hasn’t been introduced, and the government recently decided to launch a consultation on the proposal.  Now, recently writing for the GMB website, Hazel Blears has set some alarm bells ringing.  She wrote: 

“The consultation proposes that the first extra holiday will come in on October 1st 2007 with the rest to follow which will benefit over 2 million workers.”

The full consultation document is available here, and it confirms that the introduction of fair holiday entitlements will be phased in.  The Government says it wants to “give time for businesses to adjust” – but in effect, they are leaving people having bank holidays nicked off them by stingy employers a full two-and-a-half years after the general election. 

Trade unions, especially the GMB and T&G, are taking this issue very seriously, and several senior TU officials have told The Daily that they will struggle to mobilise union activists to campaign for the party at the next election unless this pledge is delivered. We have eight days to win the next election, and we shouldn’t let the business lobby and government timidity stop us.   


3 Responses to 8 days to win the election

  1. Omar Salem says:

    Whilst one can understand The Daily’s concern that the promise contained in the Warwick agreement is kept, but my understanding is that agreement was always meant to be delivered over the course of a Parliament. It seems reasonable to allow the Government to manage the transition toward s that end, and make a judgement when the Parliament has actually ended, rather than just over a year after it began.

  2. Matthew says:

    Omar – you are right to say that we should wait and see before getting the hump – but I dont think anything in the piece suggests the writer was condemning the government.

    I think we have to be clear up front and say that if this policy isnt introduced, then it is going to massively hurt Labour. It would be out of order to complain after the event without having warned about it up front.

    The specific issue here is that this eye catching promise has waited over 2 years to be implemented, causes annoyance for the workers who expected extra holidays – and there is no clear timetable for it to be fully implemented. It causes worries.

  3. Jon Rogers says:

    worries isn’t the word!

    Warwick seems to be a wish list of which the Government will implement bits and pieces as they see fit.

    Not good enough! (which is why I spend some time at john4leader.org.uk now and again 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: